|
1)
Message boards :
News :
Unplanned maintenance
(Message 2148)
Posted 14 days ago by Speedy Post: At the time of writing this the transistor has a backlog of |
|
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
task completion time triples after several hours
(Message 2141)
Posted 21 Oct 2025 by Speedy Post: On my desktop 4090 running at 350 watt using one monitor I get average runtime of 78 – 79 seconds after a long time running I get between 174 – 180 seconds if I pause a task letting another one start then resuming the paused task it will start from the beginning and return to my average runtime. I gather to get the impressive runtime of between 20 – 50 seconds you are running your card at full power of 450 watt? |
|
3)
Message boards :
News :
Part 3 of the 10^21 search has started
(Message 2135)
Posted 15 Oct 2025 by Speedy Post: The WUs for part 4 should take 5-6 months to process at the current speed. So maybe you will be able to get to 1 billion :) Thanks heaps, appreciate the feedback |
|
4)
Message boards :
News :
Part 3 of the 10^21 search has started
(Message 2133)
Posted 13 Oct 2025 by Speedy Post: Top credit badge is given for 1 billion credits, so probably not... Part 4 shouldn't find any new amicable pairs, that's the whole point of it - it will double check the exhaustive searches I did before in that range. Thank you for the feedback. From what you have said it sounds like the double check part of the project will be reasonably short. For example not lasting into February 2026 |
|
5)
Message boards :
News :
Part 3 of the 10^21 search has started
(Message 2131)
Posted 13 Oct 2025 by Speedy Post: There will be one more part for 1021, several months worth of tasks - it will check largest prime factors > 1014 to confirm that all amicable numbers are already found in that range. If I maintain a "avg work done" of a "4,200,000" am I in with a chance of being able to reach the top "credit badge" (currently 368,529,287 before the end the project?. I gather finding her amicable pairs should be reasonably low while working on part 4? |
|
6)
Message boards :
News :
Part 3 of the 10^21 search has started
(Message 2128)
Posted 5 Oct 2025 by Speedy Post: At the time of posting providing there is no downtime between the end of part 3 & beginning of part 4. Part 4 will start around 2025-11-02 |
|
7)
Message boards :
News :
Part 3 of the 10^21 search has started
(Message 2112)
Posted 20 Sep 2025 by Speedy Post: Appreciate the feedback. Look forward to hearing more about part 4 when the time comes. Looks like a couple of pairs were found yesterday/today (2025/2025-09-19). https://sech.me/ap/log/2025/2025-09-19/VOLUNTEERS%40BOINC.txt |
|
8)
Message boards :
News :
Part 3 of the 10^21 search has started
(Message 2110)
Posted 18 Sep 2025 by Speedy Post: At the time of this post there is 17.0919% remaining of part 3 at the current speed (eqv) 9,743.98 x Intel Core i9-14900KF it is expected to be completed in November (2025) |
|
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
task completion time triples after several hours
(Message 2109)
Posted 11 Sep 2025 by Speedy Post: I have used MSI Ventus desktop 3080 card before and found really good. |
|
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
task completion time triples after several hours
(Message 2107)
Posted 11 Sep 2025 by Speedy Post: Interesting how my 4090 is matching a 5060 TI in terms of runtime. I must say you have an impressive RAC Yes I am running 1 monitor off the card |
|
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
task completion time triples after several hours
(Message 2103)
Posted 6 Sep 2025 by Speedy Post: Interestingly I am seeing the similar behaviour. I sometimes have tasks that will run for over 3 minutes. I get around this problem by simply suspending then resuming the task in Boinc manager (if I happened to notice tasks are running longer than around 1 minute 40 seconds) I am running my card at 320 Watt. I didn't notice a reduction in time running it at 450 Watt |
|
12)
Message boards :
Bug tracker :
Wrong operating system
(Message 2091)
Posted 11 Aug 2025 by Speedy Post: Have you installed Podman? To install Podman follow these instructions https://github.com/BOINC/boinc/wiki/Installing-Docker-on-Windows |
|
13)
Message boards :
Bug tracker :
Wrong operating system
(Message 2088)
Posted 10 Aug 2025 by Speedy Post: Each to their own. I also run Windows 11 and do not have an issue with my machine reporting it is running Linux. Personally I like it Here are the client release notes for version 8 https://github.com/BOINC/boinc/wiki/Client-release-notes |
|
14)
Message boards :
Bug tracker :
Wrong operating system
(Message 2086)
Posted 10 Aug 2025 by Speedy Post: It's showing the correct OS this was brought in with Boinc version 8.2.4 |
|
15)
Message boards :
Bug tracker :
Amicable pairs counter defect?
(Message 2079)
Posted 16 Jun 2025 by Speedy Post: It is not uncommon to go for long periods without finding Amicable pairs. Use the following link https://sech.me/ap/log/2025/2025-06-15/VOLUNTEERS%40BOINC.txt to look through and see how many pairs have been found each day (by changing the 06–15 numbers to whichever date you would like to look at) On 15 June there was only 2 Amicable pairs found. I have crunched many tasks in the past and not found any pairs |
|
16)
Message boards :
News :
Credit badges
(Message 2064)
Posted 24 Apr 2025 by Speedy Post: What has happened to the "discovered pairs badges"? I have crunched millions and my discovered pairs badge has stopped at 100?? Your Amicable pairs discovered is 150. In regards to credit you have 75,287,000 (at time of posting) |
|
17)
Message boards :
News :
WU size and credits are doubled now
(Message 2047)
Posted 25 Mar 2025 by Speedy Post: I have also noticed some long-running task times on a 4080 super. Ran for just over 14 minutes https://sech.me/boinc/Amicable/result.php?resultid=97103607 Ran for just over 13 minutes https://sech.me/boinc/Amicable/result.php?resultid=97107893 I gather this is something to do with my hardware as this is happened before. I believe the above tasks are running over twice the amount of time they should be. Since task time nine double I believe that should be a maximum of just over 6 minutes Generally tasks seem to run around this 3 minute mark https://sech.me/boinc/Amicable/result.php?resultid=97107075 |
|
18)
Message boards :
News :
Beta test of part 3 of the 10^21 search
(Message 1922)
Posted 5 Jun 2024 by Speedy Post: Thanks I appreciate the insight as to how it works |
|
19)
Message boards :
News :
Beta test of part 3 of the 10^21 search
(Message 1920)
Posted 4 Jun 2024 by Speedy Post: My question was more : since you run it standalone, how can it be that "127658160073" is the only parameter needed to feed "all the data to the task" ? I have no idea |
|
20)
Message boards :
News :
Beta test of part 3 of the 10^21 search
(Message 1918)
Posted 26 May 2024 by Speedy Post: Yes PowerShell is a shell/terminal same as good old cmd.exe from windows, the purpose is the same. I ran a task in standalone mode because I wanted to see how long it was going to take to run, when I ran the task on Boinc it took 12 minutes where it should have taken around 3 minutes. in standalone mode it did take around 3 minutes |
|
21)
Message boards :
News :
Beta test of part 3 of the 10^21 search
(Message 1916)
Posted 23 May 2024 by Speedy Post: @[AF>Le_Pommier] Jerome_C2005 you assumed correctly I am using Windows. Thanks for your steps the only thing I have to do differently was use command prompt instead of power shell to get it to run. I am not sure why it took so long to run in Boinc. Will put it down to something within Windows. As you can see from output below at ran in a smidge under 3 minutes, right where it's meant to run on my card :-) 16:22:23 (18576): Can't open init data file - running in standalone mode Initializing prime tables...done C:\Users\User\Documents\GitHub\Amicable\Amicable\Amicable_OpenCL.cpp, line 1118: OpenCL platform available: NVIDIA CUDA C:\Users\User\Documents\GitHub\Amicable\Amicable\Amicable_OpenCL.cpp, line 1134: Using 'NVIDIA CUDA' OpenCL platform C:\Users\User\Documents\GitHub\Amicable\Amicable\Amicable_OpenCL.cpp, line 577: Self-test passed 16:25:14 (18576): called boinc_finish(0) Thankyou for all the help along the way I appreciated it |
|
22)
Message boards :
News :
Beta test of part 3 of the 10^21 search
(Message 1910)
Posted 19 May 2024 by Speedy Post: For that specific WU, just run How/where do I run it, in command prompt? |
|
23)
Message boards :
News :
Beta test of part 3 of the 10^21 search
(Message 1906)
Posted 19 May 2024 by Speedy Post: Can you try to run the same WU again, manually? And without anything else running on the PC. I think it was a random fluctuation not related to the WU itself. Yes I can run it manually if you can give me the steps to do so. (Feel free to message me if you would prefer) I am not sure how I can run the workunit without anything else running? I am comfortable with work units running longer. At the end of the day and need to use my computer while boinc is running. I don't understand why there is large variations in run time when there is plenty of RAM and free CPU cores although it may be a hyper- threaded one and not an actual core. It may be 20/05/24 NZST/New Zealand standard time before I come back to you with result |
|
24)
Message boards :
News :
Beta test of part 3 of the 10^21 search
(Message 1904)
Posted 19 May 2024 by Speedy Post: Work I processed on 17 May. Some work units complete in 3 minutes or under https://sech.me/boinc/Amicable/result.php?resultid=78865397, https://sech.me/boinc/Amicable/result.php?resultid=78849434 however there is the occasional 1 that also completed in 15 minutes 22 seconds https://sech.me/boinc/Amicable/result.php?resultid=78860666 I have noticed though if I suspend and resume a task it will go back to the beginning no checkpoints, many complete within 3 minutes. I am not always able to do this to every task. As previously stated throughout this thread I am using a 4080. Apart from using my computer for general things while they are processing nothing else is being used by my GPU All I'm saying is tasks do not appear to run a consistent time is 3 minutes each on my card |
|
25)
Message boards :
News :
Beta test of part 3 of the 10^21 search
(Message 1887)
Posted 11 Apr 2024 by Speedy Post: Thanks for the feedback, not all tasks that take that long (as you noted) I will keep an eye on things |
|
26)
Message boards :
News :
Beta test of part 3 of the 10^21 search
(Message 1885)
Posted 10 Apr 2024 by Speedy Post: GPUs are much faster with part 3 WUs (less than 2 minutes on RTX 4090), The following: https://sech.me/boinc/Amicable/result.php?resultid=76449455 took 14 minutes and 15 seconds, is this an acceptable runtime on a 4080? |
|
27)
Message boards :
News :
Beta test of part 3 of the 10^21 search
(Message 1858)
Posted 22 Mar 2024 by Speedy Post: Sergei feel free to have a look at these https://sech.me/boinc/Amicable/result.php?resultid=75231602 ran for 39 minutes 23 seconds & https://sech.me/boinc/Amicable/result.php?resultid=75212364 ran for 41 minutes 35 seconds. Could it be these are not suited well to a 4080? 2nd task was paired with a 3080 in a laptop and ran for around 15 minutes |
|
28)
Message boards :
News :
Beta test of part 3 of the 10^21 search
(Message 1854)
Posted 22 Mar 2024 by Speedy Post: With part 3 is there going to be any change to the credit awarded? Have a read of the following thread https://sech.me/boinc/Amicable/forum_thread.php?id=298 I think it will help explain about why your RAC is dropping |
|
29)
Message boards :
News :
Beta test of part 3 of the 10^21 search
(Message 1849)
Posted 14 Mar 2024 by Speedy Post: With part 3 is there going to be any change to the credit awarded? |
|
30)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Um, Got a Couple of Whoppers?
(Message 1742)
Posted 13 Dec 2023 by Speedy Post: https://sech.me/boinc/Amicable/result.php?resultid=69566020 ran for 28 minutes and 22 seconds on a RTX 4080. I didn't think I would see a task run for that length of time for this project on my card. I did not have time to check the GPU utilization this may have been really low. |
|
31)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Um, Got a Couple of Whoppers?
(Message 1735)
Posted 28 Oct 2023 by Speedy Post: Further to my post below. I now understand why the task ran for so long it was because GPU utilisation was low for the majority of the task. I am unsure though why the 2060 finished it in less than half the time |
|
32)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Um, Got a Couple of Whoppers?
(Message 1734)
Posted 28 Oct 2023 by Speedy Post: Task run time of 42 minutes 22 seconds CPU time of 2 minutes 22 seconds, (running with one CPU core to feed the GPU) https://sech.me/boinc/Amicable/result.php?resultid=67308091 on my RTX 3080. Interestingly the other task ran on a RTX 2060 only taking 13 minutes 33 seconds I am wondering does this task qualify for extra credit? All good if it doesn't, just thought I would ask. Maybe not since the 2060 ran it in under 15 minutes |
|
33)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Milestones
(Message 1729)
Posted 4 Oct 2023 by Speedy Post: That's sad to hear do you find crunching lonely. I hope this thread brings you happiness. Congratulations on the hardware you are using |
|
34)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Noticing my GPU Utilization isn't steady anymore?
(Message 1684)
Posted 4 Jun 2023 by Speedy Post: In regards to the V RAM usage it has been 7 GB per task for long as I can remember, have a look at top news item on the front page dated 25 October 2019. I have a 3080 and my kernel size is set to 21I don't encounter any problems that I have noticed |
|
35)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Noticing my GPU Utilization isn't steady anymore?
(Message 1682)
Posted 31 May 2023 by Speedy Post: Both the project you are running require a reasonable amount of system memory. I believe Amicable Numbers needs around 7 GB per task and Einstein also requires a reasonable amount of memory. So I am not sure if you have a memory leak or if it was just a combination of 2 memory intensive projects |
|
36)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Noticing my GPU Utilization isn't steady anymore?
(Message 1680)
Posted 31 May 2023 by Speedy Post: Seems like a decent over clock. I'm not in a place to comment in regards to you GPU clock bouncing around it sounds reasonable. One thing I would suggest trying is return GPU clocks back to what they were before you make changes and see if the GPU utilisation stops fluctuating. This is assuming you are wanting to find out what caused it |
|
37)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Noticing my GPU Utilization isn't steady anymore?
(Message 1678)
Posted 30 May 2023 by Speedy Post: I would recommend using a program called GPU Z, this will give you much more accurate reading on your GPU utilisation. To be honest I and seeing the same 3 – 4% fluctuation using task manager On Windows 11 with a 3080 I am seeing a fluctuation of between 3 and 4% utilisation anywhere from 96 up to 100% I don't feel this is anything to worry about. |
|
38)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No new amicable pairs
(Message 1660)
Posted 8 Apr 2023 by Speedy Post: I have to agree pairs have certainly been few and far between lately. I have read the information from post 1630 & understand completely. On the bright side credit is always good :-) |
|
39)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Um, Got a Couple of Whoppers?
(Message 1640)
Posted 16 Jan 2023 by Speedy Post: https://sech.me/boinc/Amicable/workunit.php?wuid=23782909 Task ran for 1 hour with 47 minutes on a RTX 3080 12 gig card and ended with 197 (0x000000C5) EXIT_TIME_LIMIT_EXCEEDED (my copy). One copy has already been returned that ran for 3 hours 8 minutes on a CPU. Task may need looking at. |
|
40)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Um, Got a Couple of Whoppers?
(Message 1616)
Posted 15 Aug 2022 by Speedy Post: Funny... I've had long WUs these last days but today I've done more than 10 WUs in less than1 minute each. Swings and roundabouts, some short some longer. It makes a nice change from tasks running for over an hour on a high-end card. I even had CPU units take around half an hour |
|
41)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Um, Got a Couple of Whoppers?
(Message 1613)
Posted 10 Aug 2022 by Speedy Post: I think we were sharing the load as I have had a few long 1's too. I let whatever is in my queue run |
|
42)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Um, Got a Couple of Whoppers?
(Message 1610)
Posted 31 Jul 2022 by Speedy Post: I just wanted to point out the following https://sech.me/boinc/Amicable/result.php?resultid=49336305 took 1 hour 27 minutes 56 seconds on a RTX 3080. I was very surprised to see the GPU utilisation was between 90/95% Out of complete curiosity what is the criteria for a long running task to receive more than the normal credit? Sent and received times are as follows 30 Jul 2022, 6:21:08 UTC 30 Jul 2022, 8:19:51 UTC |
|
43)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Um, Got a Couple of Whoppers?
(Message 1591)
Posted 26 Mar 2022 by Speedy Post: Thanks for letting us know what's happening. With more numbers to search within each task this may increase the chances of discovering more pairs |
|
44)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Um, Got a Couple of Whoppers?
(Message 1588)
Posted 26 Mar 2022 by Speedy Post: I agree some tasks are long. I will process whatever I am given to help the project out. Hopefully the longer tasks will be made shorter |
|
45)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Um, Got a Couple of Whoppers?
(Message 1583)
Posted 4 Mar 2022 by Speedy Post: I can also back this up. Some tasks are bouncing around in terms of GPU load from 74% right up to 98% particular task I am referring to is 45999950 ran for 1 hour 22 minutes and 36 seconds have also noticed tasks seem to speed up near the end, have you noticed this? The longest task I have had recently is 45994289 it ran for 1 hour 29 minutes and 6 seconds. All of these tasks in a on a RTX 2070 on Windows 11 It appears that is not the case I thought if a task ran slower there were pairs in it, my pairs discovered have not increased for a long time. I will also be interested to hear if credit will be adjusted to accommodate longer running tasks |
|
46)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
GPU Tasks aborting
(Message 1563)
Posted 27 Nov 2021 by Speedy Post: Task that you have provided did get validated |
|
47)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Um, Got a Couple of Whoppers?
(Message 1551)
Posted 3 Nov 2021 by Speedy Post: I'll split all huge tasks into smaller ones and reissue them. In the future tasks/work units may need to be made shorter. Task 43106107 took 2 hours 33 minutes 34 seconds on a RTX 2070. Is this too long for a 2070 GPU? If it's any assistance I am running Windows 10 professional 21 H1 took my wing person 3 hours 6 minutes and 3 seconds on a 1660 TI also using Windows 10 Professional |
|
48)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Unable to upload results
(Message 1547)
Posted 1 Oct 2021 by Speedy Post: I can confirm uploads are working. I haven't had any stuck uploads. Got some work to see whether the issue had been fixed. Everything is working as expected from New Zealand 2/10/2021 8:53:02 AM | Amicable Numbers | Started upload of amicable_10_21_17402_1633101902.057197_410_0_r1019061241_0 2/10/2021 8:53:04 AM | Amicable Numbers | Finished upload of amicable_10_21_17402_1633101902.057197_410_0_r1019061241_0 |
|
49)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Any GPU tasks coming?
(Message 1534)
Posted 8 Sep 2021 by Speedy Post: I am receiving plenty of work for my RTX 2070. Give it another go |
|
50)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Um, Got a Couple of Whoppers?
(Message 1530)
Posted 17 Jul 2021 by Speedy Post: yeah i recently have gotten some huge estimates for completion. According to the current estimate , it says it will be 7,438 days to complete. My hardware is not that bad. If it was me I would let it run for a a few hours or the same amount of time that previous tasks have run as the time may decrease to a realistic value. If you don't think it will reach its deadline feel free to abort |
©2025 Sergei Chernykh