Posts by Tommy Owens

1) Message boards : Bug tracker : v3.08 (opencl_nvidia) x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Error while computing (Message 1869) Posted 27 days ago by Tommy Owens Post: That was it - these recent wu are using almost twice the GPU memory: 0 N/A N/A 44957 C ...inc_Amicable/amicable_OpenCL_v_3_08 1724MiB \| 0 N/A N/A 46310 C ...inc_Amicable/amicable_OpenCL_v_3_08 1724MiB \| 0 N/A N/A 53400 C ...inc_Amicable/amicable_OpenCL_v_3_08 3362MiB \| Thanks Tommy
2) Message boards : Bug tracker : v3.08 (opencl_nvidia) x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Error while computing (Message 1867) Posted 28 days ago by Tommy Owens Post: I'm seeing multiple failures running two threads of v3.08 (opencl_nvidia) x86_64-pc-linux-gnu on an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with 6144MiB GPU memory and 32gb ram. Amicable/Amicable_OpenCL.cpp, line 302: Kernel size for NVIDIA GPU has been set to 23 Amicable/Amicable_OpenCL.cpp, line 577: Self-test passed Amicable/Amicable_OpenCL.cpp, line 592: clEnqueueWriteBuffer returned error -4 2024-03-27 17:33:48 (44894): called boinc_finish(-1) amicable_10_21_15837_1711569302.291305_143_0 Tommy
3) Message boards : Bug tracker : Your ReCaptcha response was not correct. Please try again. (Message 1650) Posted 6 Mar 2023 by Tommy Owens Post: Has anyone found a workaround for this problem? Notice: Undefined index: g-recaptcha-response in /home/boincadm/boinc/amicable/html/inc/recaptchalib.php on line 49
4) Message boards : Bug tracker : Your ReCaptcha response was not correct. Please try again. (Message 1649) Posted 6 Mar 2023 by Tommy Owens Post: Has anyone found a workaround for this problem? Notice: Undefined index: g-recaptcha-response in /home/boincadm/boinc/amicable/html/inc/recaptchalib.php on line 49
5) Message boards : Number crunching : Stats look wrong. (Message 1621) Posted 19 Aug 2022 by Tommy Owens Post: My personal stats don't appear to be correct. I just signed up on 14 August 2022. I've processed only 533 tasks, yet I am credited with 589 Amicable pairs discovered. I don't understand how that is possible. I see discussions about finding 1 new pair per 100-200 tasks. Thanks for your help. Tommy