Part 3 of the 10^21 search has started

Message boards : News : Part 3 of the 10^21 search has started

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Sergei Chernykh
Project administrator
Project developer

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 17
Posts: 561
Credit: 72,451,573
RAC: 0
   
Message 1862 - Posted: 27 Mar 2024, 10:24:42 UTC
Last modified: 9 Apr 2024, 9:24:03 UTC

Part 2 of the 1021 search will be finished, for the most part, today. There are still ~2000 unfinished WUs which can take up to a couple of weeks to complete, depending on individual participants processing them.

Part 3 of the search will look for amicable pairs where the smaller member of the pair has its largest prime factor between 1011 and 1014:

m=m1*p, 1011 < p < 1014

There are too many primes larger than 1014 (all primes up to 5*1019 need to be checked), so they will require a different approach and a new application when the time comes.

Most of the participants have already started getting part 3 WUs. The new work units will require ~2.5-2.7 GB RAM on CPU, and the same amount of RAM on GPU (for GPU applications), so the minimum requirement for GPUs will be 3 GB RAM.

Update April 9th, 2024: I found a bug in OpenCL applications, which resulted in many false negatives (around 12.5%). The bug was in the new code that I added for the part 3, so the previous search is unaffected. Version 3.09 has this bug fixed, but I had to restart the part 3. Luckily, we were only a couple of weeks in.
ID: 1862 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [AF>Amis des Lapins] Bipleouf

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 17
Posts: 10
Credit: 11,968,152
RAC: 0
   
Message 1863 - Posted: 27 Mar 2024, 12:01:09 UTC - in response to Message 1862.  

Très bonne nouvelle.
On est prêt pour manger toute cette nouvelle aventure.
Merci pour ton travail :)
ID: 1863 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Vitaly

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 22
Posts: 1
Credit: 71,185,284
RAC: 6,041
   
Message 1871 - Posted: 28 Mar 2024, 19:19:40 UTC - in response to Message 1863.  

It is interesting how many other searches do you expect?
ID: 1871 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Tigers_Dave
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Oct 22
Posts: 59
Credit: 18,506,676,709
RAC: 26,705,344
    
Message 1876 - Posted: 3 Apr 2024, 1:31:00 UTC - in response to Message 1862.  

Thanks for the update, Sergei. I greatly appreciate the timely updates and explanations! I am delighted to be crunching on behalf of such a well-managed enterprise.
ID: 1876 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sergei Chernykh
Project administrator
Project developer

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 17
Posts: 561
Credit: 72,451,573
RAC: 0
   
Message 1882 - Posted: 9 Apr 2024, 9:20:53 UTC
Last modified: 9 Apr 2024, 9:24:18 UTC

I found a bug in OpenCL applications, which resulted in many false negatives (around 12.5%). The bug was in the new code that I added for the part 3, so the previous search is unaffected. Version 3.09 has this bug fixed, but I had to restart the part 3. Luckily, we were only a couple of weeks in.
ID: 1882 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Gnarwhals

Send message
Joined: 18 Jul 23
Posts: 1
Credit: 295,501,305
RAC: 2
   
Message 1883 - Posted: 9 Apr 2024, 10:49:01 UTC - in response to Message 1882.  

Good catch! Will all Part 3 WU's run on 3.08 need to be re-run? And if so, will the false-negative tasks and/or their earned credit be removed?
ID: 1883 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sergei Chernykh
Project administrator
Project developer

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 17
Posts: 561
Credit: 72,451,573
RAC: 0
   
Message 1884 - Posted: 9 Apr 2024, 12:29:11 UTC - in response to Message 1883.  
Last modified: 9 Apr 2024, 12:29:35 UTC

All old v3.08 WUs need to be re-run (each WU missed ~12.5% of amicable pairs), but earned credit will remain.
ID: 1884 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Speedy

Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 17
Posts: 97
Credit: 377,293,287
RAC: 4,836,504
    
Message 2110 - Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 21:30:59 UTC

At the time of this post there is 17.0919% remaining of part 3 at the current speed (eqv) 9,743.98 x Intel Core i9-14900KF it is expected to be completed in November (2025)
ID: 2110 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sergei Chernykh
Project administrator
Project developer

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 17
Posts: 561
Credit: 72,451,573
RAC: 0
   
Message 2111 - Posted: 20 Sep 2025, 6:23:45 UTC - in response to Message 2110.  
Last modified: 21 Sep 2025, 8:23:17 UTC

Part 3 completes when the largest prime factor in M reaches 1014. Currently it's at ~3*1013. As for P_max > 1014, all amicable pairs in that range should already be known thanks to a few exhaustive searches I did on my own, using a different approach. But to double check it, I will run the regular search in the range 1014...1015 - this will be part 4 of the search.
ID: 2111 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Speedy

Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 17
Posts: 97
Credit: 377,293,287
RAC: 4,836,504
    
Message 2112 - Posted: 20 Sep 2025, 9:04:56 UTC - in response to Message 2111.  
Last modified: 20 Sep 2025, 9:18:33 UTC

Appreciate the feedback. Look forward to hearing more about part 4 when the time comes.

Looks like a couple of pairs were found yesterday/today (2025/2025-09-19). https://sech.me/ap/log/2025/2025-09-19/VOLUNTEERS%40BOINC.txt
ID: 2112 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
KeithBriggs

Send message
Joined: 12 Jan 25
Posts: 19
Credit: 2,423,239,219
RAC: 24,853,444
   
Message 2113 - Posted: 22 Sep 2025, 3:06:39 UTC - in response to Message 2112.  

I'm not seeing the new larger WU. Consistently I'm seeing the same 1276MiB.
ID: 2113 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sergei Chernykh
Project administrator
Project developer

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 17
Posts: 561
Credit: 72,451,573
RAC: 0
   
Message 2114 - Posted: 22 Sep 2025, 11:22:08 UTC - in response to Message 2113.  

There is no larger WUs, at least in terms of used GPU memory,
ID: 2114 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Allen Paschke

Send message
Joined: 27 Jan 18
Posts: 26
Credit: 137,031,501
RAC: 279,532
    
Message 2126 - Posted: 5 Oct 2025, 17:42:54 UTC - in response to Message 2111.  

How many more parts are there to 10^21? When is it estimated that 10^22 will begin.
ID: 2126 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sergei Chernykh
Project administrator
Project developer

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 17
Posts: 561
Credit: 72,451,573
RAC: 0
   
Message 2127 - Posted: 5 Oct 2025, 18:10:53 UTC - in response to Message 2126.  

There will be one more part for 1021, several months worth of tasks - it will check largest prime factors > 1014 to confirm that all amicable numbers are already found in that range.

As for 1022 - I'm not sure it's feasible. The current search took 6 years, so 1022 should take more than 60 years (the scaling is a bit worse than linear)...
ID: 2127 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Speedy

Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 17
Posts: 97
Credit: 377,293,287
RAC: 4,836,504
    
Message 2128 - Posted: 5 Oct 2025, 23:46:51 UTC - in response to Message 2126.  

At the time of posting providing there is no downtime between the end of part 3 & beginning of part 4. Part 4 will start around 2025-11-02
ID: 2128 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Allen Paschke

Send message
Joined: 27 Jan 18
Posts: 26
Credit: 137,031,501
RAC: 279,532
    
Message 2129 - Posted: 8 Oct 2025, 21:13:28 UTC - in response to Message 2127.  

In late-2019, had you estimated how long 10^21 would take to complete, you probably would have estimated much longer than 6 years. More people are getting GPUs and GPUs are getting faster. However, 10^22 is still going to take a long, long time.

What are your plans for Amicable Numbers after 10^21?

It would be fun to search for Amicable Pairs for 10^22, 10^23, etc. for those factors which are likely to produce many pairs, without running 10^22, 10^23, etc. for all possibilities. Based on the runs beyond 10^21 that you, Chesnut, Costello and others have done, you should have a good idea which factors are likely to produce the most Amicable Pairs.
ID: 2129 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sergei Chernykh
Project administrator
Project developer

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 17
Posts: 561
Credit: 72,451,573
RAC: 0
   
Message 2130 - Posted: 10 Oct 2025, 9:15:57 UTC - in response to Message 2129.  

I estimated that 1021 would take 40 years, and it took 6 years only: https://sech.me/boinc/Amicable/forum_thread.php?id=77&postid=614#614

But it's mostly thanks to the other exhaustive searches I did for largest prime factors > 1014. If not for them, the current search would have to continue up until 5*1019, and that's at least another 6 years.
ID: 2130 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Speedy

Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 17
Posts: 97
Credit: 377,293,287
RAC: 4,836,504
    
Message 2131 - Posted: 13 Oct 2025, 1:49:31 UTC - in response to Message 2127.  
Last modified: 13 Oct 2025, 2:05:10 UTC

There will be one more part for 1021, several months worth of tasks - it will check largest prime factors > 1014 to confirm that all amicable numbers are already found in that range.

As for 1022 - I'm not sure it's feasible. The current search took 6 years, so 1022 should take more than 60 years (the scaling is a bit worse than linear)...

If I maintain a "avg work done" of a "4,200,000" am I in with a chance of being able to reach the top "credit badge" (currently 368,529,287 before the end the project?. I gather finding her amicable pairs should be reasonably low while working on part 4?
ID: 2131 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sergei Chernykh
Project administrator
Project developer

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 17
Posts: 561
Credit: 72,451,573
RAC: 0
   
Message 2132 - Posted: 13 Oct 2025, 18:36:18 UTC - in response to Message 2131.  

Top credit badge is given for 1 billion credits, so probably not... Part 4 shouldn't find any new amicable pairs, that's the whole point of it - it will double check the exhaustive searches I did before in that range.
ID: 2132 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Speedy

Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 17
Posts: 97
Credit: 377,293,287
RAC: 4,836,504
    
Message 2133 - Posted: 13 Oct 2025, 20:12:03 UTC - in response to Message 2132.  

Top credit badge is given for 1 billion credits, so probably not... Part 4 shouldn't find any new amicable pairs, that's the whole point of it - it will double check the exhaustive searches I did before in that range.

Thank you for the feedback. From what you have said it sounds like the double check part of the project will be reasonably short. For example not lasting into February 2026
ID: 2133 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : News : Part 3 of the 10^21 search has started


©2025 Sergei Chernykh