No Tasks for a while

Message boards : Number crunching : No Tasks for a while

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · Next

AuthorMessage
nekomi_ch

Send message
Joined: 5 Apr 25
Posts: 12
Credit: 15,326,746
RAC: 52,647
   
Message 2307 - Posted: 24 Mar 2026, 18:57:23 UTC
Last modified: 24 Mar 2026, 18:57:45 UTC

I hope this reminds the people who are running the project to load new tasks to the server thanks.
ID: 2307 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Speedy

Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 17
Posts: 131
Credit: 1,178,809,642
RAC: 501,471
    
Message 2308 - Posted: 24 Mar 2026, 20:57:32 UTC
Last modified: 24 Mar 2026, 21:00:17 UTC

At time of posting Workunits waiting for validation 159322 I am not 100% certain however I believe the server is working through the validation backlog when this has lowered new work will be created. I have no idea what the timeframe will be. It may take it just over 6 hours as this is how long it says the backlog is however this may not be the case
ID: 2308 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sergei Chernykh
Project administrator
Project developer

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 17
Posts: 598
Credit: 72,451,573
RAC: 0
   
Message 2309 - Posted: 24 Mar 2026, 21:15:29 UTC
Last modified: 24 Mar 2026, 21:15:37 UTC

I don't know why the backlog is not clearing. I've stopped new task creation for now to see what happens over the night.
ID: 2309 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Speedy

Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 17
Posts: 131
Credit: 1,178,809,642
RAC: 501,471
    
Message 2310 - Posted: 24 Mar 2026, 21:19:54 UTC - in response to Message 2309.  
Last modified: 24 Mar 2026, 21:22:06 UTC

Appreciate the information. Hopefully it will start to clear overnight. In the last 30 minutes 16 results of mine have changed from pending to validated
ID: 2310 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
makracz

Send message
Joined: 6 Mar 25
Posts: 4
Credit: 15,180,396,824
RAC: 17,194,704
   
Message 2311 - Posted: 24 Mar 2026, 21:59:10 UTC - in response to Message 2309.  

I don't know why the backlog is not clearing. I've stopped new task creation for now to see what happens over the night.
Sergei, there are now (21:55 GMT) over 3k new tasks available. Were these created before you stopped new task creation?
ID: 2311 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sergei Chernykh
Project administrator
Project developer

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 17
Posts: 598
Credit: 72,451,573
RAC: 0
   
Message 2313 - Posted: 25 Mar 2026, 7:22:01 UTC - in response to Message 2311.  

Yes, they were created before. It's a huge backlog overall.
ID: 2313 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile SzaMoT
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 Feb 17
Posts: 3
Credit: 6,685,585,421
RAC: 17,193,929
    
Message 2314 - Posted: 25 Mar 2026, 7:38:38 UTC

A large number of tasks to be approved
Validation pending 24 975

ID: 2314 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
nekomi_ch

Send message
Joined: 5 Apr 25
Posts: 12
Credit: 15,326,746
RAC: 52,647
   
Message 2315 - Posted: 25 Mar 2026, 9:32:51 UTC
Last modified: 25 Mar 2026, 9:33:19 UTC

Workunits waiting for validation 155015

Still bad
ID: 2315 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Fuzzy Duck

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 19
Posts: 18
Credit: 7,544,416,424
RAC: 401,687
    
Message 2355 - Posted: 8 Apr 2026, 8:48:22 UTC - in response to Message 2315.  

Looks like the servers have no new WU's. Time to move on to a new project.
ID: 2355 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sergei Chernykh
Project administrator
Project developer

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 17
Posts: 598
Credit: 72,451,573
RAC: 0
   
Message 2356 - Posted: 8 Apr 2026, 9:31:31 UTC

All WUs are completed now, there will be no new tasks. There are still some pending "in progress" tasks that prevent the progress from reaching 100%, but they will be cleared as "timed out" or "cancelled" soon.
ID: 2356 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
nekomi_ch

Send message
Joined: 5 Apr 25
Posts: 12
Credit: 15,326,746
RAC: 52,647
   
Message 2357 - Posted: 8 Apr 2026, 10:11:52 UTC - in response to Message 2356.  

Does this mean that we have successfully completed this project? If so, good job everyone.
ID: 2357 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Skillz

Send message
Joined: 26 Apr 18
Posts: 13
Credit: 9,854,065,449
RAC: 16,955,624
    
Message 2358 - Posted: 8 Apr 2026, 11:56:01 UTC

Almost, all tasks have been sent out it seems. Just waiting on everyone to finish them and return them.

This could take a while if people have let some of their tasks time out. With such long deadlines we could be waiting a week or more for the task to timeout and get resent.

Time will tell, but so far with less than 3k tasks in progress it's been dropping really fast. Had almost 30k tasks in progress 12 hours ago.
ID: 2358 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sergei Chernykh
Project administrator
Project developer

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 17
Posts: 598
Credit: 72,451,573
RAC: 0
   
Message 2359 - Posted: 8 Apr 2026, 12:45:46 UTC - in response to Message 2358.  

Some people have been bunkering tasks like crazy for the past few days.

I didn't want to let it drag on for several weeks, so I kept issuing extra tasks for remaining WUs until they all got validated. Then I just force timed out remaining tasks. It's all clear now.
ID: 2359 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
pschoefer

Send message
Joined: 9 May 20
Posts: 2
Credit: 1,291,924,376
RAC: 2,842,999
    
Message 2360 - Posted: 8 Apr 2026, 12:46:35 UTC - in response to Message 2358.  

Almost, all tasks have been sent out it seems. Just waiting on everyone to finish them and return them.

No, any tasks returned now are already worthless from the project's perspective, as all workunits have been sent out to lots of additional hosts and already met their quorum, and not even validated any more, as their deadline was moved up and they are too late now. It might make sense for the project to set send_result_abort and actually cancel the remaining tasks, as otherwise tasks that are already running on the clients will run to completion despite being superfluous, even if they happen to contact the server now. The updated deadline is not propagated to the clients, so this is not sufficient to cause them to abort any task in progress.

There are less wasteful ways to wrap up a project, but at least this one was actually finished unlike far too many others that just were abandoned or disappeared without any notice.
ID: 2360 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
walli

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 26
Posts: 1
Credit: 92,644,096
RAC: 669,640
   
Message 2361 - Posted: 8 Apr 2026, 13:10:38 UTC - in response to Message 2360.  

I absolutely agree with pschoefer. This chaos caused by the zigzag course in the past few days was more than unnecessary from the cruncher's perspective. I personally lost tasks worth millions of credits, most of them already finished, and they all got invalidated. Furthermore, this also prevented me from reaching my next milestone. I'm a bit disappointed now.
ID: 2361 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Skillz

Send message
Joined: 26 Apr 18
Posts: 13
Credit: 9,854,065,449
RAC: 16,955,624
    
Message 2362 - Posted: 8 Apr 2026, 13:18:14 UTC
Last modified: 8 Apr 2026, 13:23:31 UTC

That's the risk one takes when modifying the client to get more task than the project set amount.

I do hope the admin leaves the server running for a little while so stats sites have time to collect the final results through.
ID: 2362 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
pschoefer

Send message
Joined: 9 May 20
Posts: 2
Credit: 1,291,924,376
RAC: 2,842,999
    
Message 2363 - Posted: 8 Apr 2026, 13:44:04 UTC - in response to Message 2362.  

That's the risk one takes when modifying the client to get more task than the project set amount.

Actually, you do not even need to modify the client to do what walli (and myself, guilty as charged :)) did. While I still agree with you and am not disappointed myself that I missed my final far-reaching goal, some resources of participants who were just crunching along without becoming creative to reach any particular goal were also wasted: e.g., almost no CPU that got assigned a new task on the last day had any chance of completing it in time. There would have been options to avoid this and still speed up the processing of the final workunits, but well, it's too late now.
ID: 2363 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sergei Chernykh
Project administrator
Project developer

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 17
Posts: 598
Credit: 72,451,573
RAC: 0
   
Message 2364 - Posted: 8 Apr 2026, 13:52:46 UTC

The project was set to send max 1 task per CPU and max 4 tasks per GPU. Normally it's not so much wasted resources, unless you start bunkering tasks. Also think that you are disappointed only because you didn't get to crunch tasks you shouldn't have in the first place (other crunchers should've gotten them - they should be the ones disappointed).
ID: 2364 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sergei Chernykh
Project administrator
Project developer

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 17
Posts: 598
Credit: 72,451,573
RAC: 0
   
Message 2366 - Posted: 8 Apr 2026, 13:57:47 UTC - in response to Message 2362.  

The server will be running in the foreseeable future. It hosts the amicable numbers database, so it's not going away just because the project ended.
ID: 2366 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Skillz

Send message
Joined: 26 Apr 18
Posts: 13
Credit: 9,854,065,449
RAC: 16,955,624
    
Message 2367 - Posted: 8 Apr 2026, 13:57:58 UTC - in response to Message 2363.  
Last modified: 8 Apr 2026, 13:58:21 UTC

Yeah, modifying the coproc file to fake number of GPUs is similar to modifying the client.

All this wouldn't have happened had the crunchers not started trying to horde tasks on the last day anyway.

Reaction and opposite reaction sort of thing.

I was hoping to reach 10B, but I didn't. Can't blame anyone but myself for not doing it sooner. I had years to push towards that goal, but chose the last few months.
ID: 2367 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : No Tasks for a while


©2026 Sergei Chernykh