Message boards : Number crunching : Slow Wu's ???
Author | Message |
---|---|
STE\/E Send message Joined: 26 Jan 17 Posts: 20 Credit: 79,023,463 RAC: 0 |
A lot of the v1.15 Wu's seem to be taking forever now on my Nvidia 1080, it's almost like it's not even running the Wu's, their taking up to 20+ Min's where before 10 Min's was about the longest with many way faster than that ... |
Rymorea Send message Joined: 25 Mar 17 Posts: 3 Credit: 25,051,333 RAC: 0 |
nearly 3-4 times long then before times. is this because of version or new tasks have long digits ? |
Sergei Chernykh Project administrator Project developer Send message Joined: 5 Jan 17 Posts: 534 Credit: 72,451,573 RAC: 0 |
It has nothing to do with version 1.15. Current WUs take ~2 times more time on average, probably because they are very rich with amicable numbers. Anyway, I've temporarily set credit per WU to 2 times the usual value. |
STE\/E Send message Joined: 26 Jan 17 Posts: 20 Credit: 79,023,463 RAC: 0 |
It has nothing to do with version 1.15. Current WUs take ~2 times more time on average, probably because they are very rich with amicable numbers. Anyway, I've temporarily set credit per WU to 2 times the usual value. Yes I've noticed the Amicable Numbers I get seem to have jumped up more as we progress ... :) |
Gibson Praise Send message Joined: 14 Mar 17 Posts: 5 Credit: 252,881,197 RAC: 0 |
Current WUs take ~2 times more time on average, probably because they are very rich with amicable numbers. Anyway, I've temporarily set credit per WU to 2 times the usual value. I had wondered if the variable times was related to finding pairs! Thank you for the adjustment! |
Message boards : Number crunching : Slow Wu's ???
©2024 Sergei Chernykh