Formal credit for new APs - how is it handled?

Message boards : Bug tracker : Formal credit for new APs - how is it handled?

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Henrik Nilsson

Send message
Joined: 27 Apr 17
Posts: 9
Credit: 16,243,969
RAC: 0
   
Message 579 - Posted: 16 Jul 2017, 22:19:28 UTC

Hi,

Here comes what may be a stupid question.

Some of the APs I have found, have two names attached to them: mine and the other guy. I understand that the relative order of these two names reflects who reported back the task first. Fair enough.

However, two of my APs have only one name attached to them, and it is not mine. It is still listed under "my" APs though.

And yes - "Should Amicable Numbers show amicable pairs discovered by you?" is ticked.

I'm probably misunderstanding something, right?
ID: 579 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sergei Chernykh
Project administrator
Project developer

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 17
Posts: 446
Credit: 72,451,573
RAC: 0
   
Message 580 - Posted: 17 Jul 2017, 5:17:02 UTC
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017, 5:17:20 UTC

Both pairs were also found by you, and they should've been "BOINC: Henrik Nilsson, jamezz". There was a bug in the code that writes names to the database, I've fixed it. I'll also write a script today that checks names on the pairs found before. Luckily, all needed data is in the database, so it can be restored.
ID: 580 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sergei Chernykh
Project administrator
Project developer

Send message
Joined: 5 Jan 17
Posts: 446
Credit: 72,451,573
RAC: 0
   
Message 581 - Posted: 17 Jul 2017, 12:13:49 UTC

Everything is fixed now. There were others with the same bug.
ID: 581 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : Bug tracker : Formal credit for new APs - how is it handled?


©2020 Sergei Chernykh