Posts by fzs600

1) Message boards : News : Beta test of part 3 of the 10^21 search (Message 1796)
Posted 11 Feb 2024 by fzs600
Post:
Hello
the application has disappeared from the list.
why?
thanks

Et ouais fzs600, c'est pas avec celle-là qu'on pourra faire des étoiles et battre des records ;)

Toutafé. :-(
2) Message boards : News : Beta test of part 3 of the 10^21 search (Message 1793)
Posted 11 Feb 2024 by fzs600
Post:
Hello
the application has disappeared from the list.
why?
thanks
3) Message boards : Number crunching : GPU version: kernel size tuning and less UI lags (Message 1306)
Posted 14 Nov 2019 by fzs600
Post:
2 wu too little crediter

10 Nov 2019, 21:13:38 UTC 14 Nov 2019, 19:29:48 UTC Terminé et validé 141,192.21 4,272.16 6,836.19 Amicable Numbers up to 10^21 v3.02 (opencl_nvidia)
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

10 Nov 2019, 21:13:36 UTC 12 Nov 2019, 20:26:03 UTC Terminé et validé 137,003.05 3,820.35 6,836.19 Amicable Numbers up to 10^21 v3.02 (opencl_nvidia)
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
4) Message boards : News : Credit badges (Message 416)
Posted 8 Apr 2017 by fzs600
Post:
Merci.
5) Message boards : Random stuff : Are Badges On the Way? (Message 164)
Posted 19 Feb 2017 by fzs600
Post:
Technically it's possible, but it will bring a huge load to the server - it will have to generate all images on the fly every time they're requested. Caching is possible of course, but it will still be worse than with static images. Another concern: badges that change every time you discover a new amicable number kind of diminish the sense of achievement compared to fixed "100-1,000-10,000 discovered numbers" badges, don't they?

You can get inspired by this
https://boinc.drugdiscoveryathome.com/forum_thread.php?id=2083&postid=4771#4771
With thresholds it's simpler
6) Message boards : Random stuff : Credit system. (Message 52)
Posted 1 Feb 2017 by fzs600
Post:
Hello i agree with tito

The credits are really too high

thank you
7) Message boards : News : Attention! There are very huge work units on the project now (Message 13)
Posted 25 Jan 2017 by fzs600
Post:
It's OK. I've set all current deadlines to be at least 9 days. If you feel you can finish it in that time, it's OK. If you don't want to run a single task for such long period, you can of course abort it. Some other user will pick it up.

it is not a problem for me

I continue

thank you
8) Message boards : News : Attention! There are very huge work units on the project now (Message 10)
Posted 25 Jan 2017 by fzs600
Post:
Application is not hung if it's running the same task for many hours.
You don't need to abort it as long as you're able to finish the task within 2 days.

My work generator is certainly not perfect, and I'll improve it before generating new work units. It was supposed to generate work units that would take no more than 2 hours on a typical 4-core Core i7 PC.

All completed huge work units will be eventually awarded with appropriate credits when they're validated.

Hello

I have a wu a 15% advancement after 24H

I continue ?

thank you



©2024 Sergei Chernykh