Posts by davidBAM

1) Message boards : Number crunching : Credit payments (Message 1475) Posted 29 Nov 2020 by davidBAM Post: You seem to miss my point
2) Message boards : Number crunching : Credit payments (Message 1473) Posted 29 Nov 2020 by davidBAM Post: As you have pointed out, I also help with the science. A lot. Whether you approve of competitive crunching or not, you will surely agree that it brings a lot of power to progress your project. If you paid credits pro-rata to run-time, all competitive crunchers would simply crunch whatever they got.
3) Message boards : Number crunching : Credit payments (Message 1471) Posted 29 Nov 2020 by davidBAM Post: I understand that the algorithms used will mean that some WU take longer to run than others; I have no problem with that. My point is that the credits awarded should be proportional to the time taken. In your own example, an hour on a 2070 pays the same as 2 minutes on the same card if you happen to be lucky enough to download at the correct time.
4) Message boards : Number crunching : Credit payments (Message 1469) Posted 28 Nov 2020 by davidBAM Post: Would it be possible to please make credit payments better reflect the run-time of the WU? I see a variation of run-times of 600% and more on the same hardware, yet all pay the same amount